Since he has a book release coming up, I wanted to feature fellow Twilight Times author Aaron Paul Lazar in another guest post. (You can find his blog in a link on the side of this page.) This one is about and for writers. Enjoy!
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
For Writers: The Ultimate Reward
by Aaron Paul Lazar
What do you picture when you dream about your book’s success? Do you envision readers stopping you in the grocery store with stars in their eyes? Getting on Oprah? Seeing your book in the front window of your local book store?
Or maybe you dream of your book riding at the top of the NY Times bestseller’s list for months at a time? How about dining in New York City with Mr. Warren Adler, of War of the Roses fame? Talk about a
dream made in Heaven, this writer is one of the century’s best. Of course, this repast would be followed by a glowing, personal endorsement of your works by the master.
Am I close?
Are you being honest?
Over the years I’ve pictured several of these dazzling dreams happening to me. Including a multi-million dollar movie deal in which Yannick Bisson (Of Murdoch Mysteries fame) plays Gus LeGarde. And of course, the world would fall in love with the LeGarde family and beg for more each year.
I imagined quitting my engineering job, staying home to write, making enough money to pay down the debt and take care of long needed repairs, like the twenty-six windows that shake and rattle every time the wind blows.
I envisioned copies of my books in everyone’s home library. Worldwide, mind you. Not just in the States.
Lots of dreams. Big dreams. And all revolved around the traditional definition of success.
Recognition. Adulation. Confirmation that my work is valued. And enough money to take care of a small country.
A few weeks ago something happened that changed all that.
Judy, one of my lunchtime walking partners, had been canceling walks and working through lunch to make extra time to care for her elderly mother. We all admired her, watching as she shopped for her mom, took her to numerous doctors’ appointments, and tended to her increasing needs with fortitude and devotion. She was one of five siblings, but took the bulk of the responsibility on her shoulders.
The cancellations increased in frequency, and it seemed we’d never see our friend on the walking trails again. We worried when her mother was admitted to the hospital. Up and down, her progress seemed to change like the December wind that skittered across the parking lots at work.
Judy was absent a few days, then a few more. Something felt wrong.
Then came the dreaded email. The subject line always seems to say the same thing. “Sad News.”
Judy’s mom had passed away, released from her earthly bonds and finally free to float among the angels.
When Judy returned to work a week later, she shared stories about her mother’s final days. One of them surprised me greatly, and fundamentally changed my definition of success.
Judy read to her mother during her final stay in the hospital. For hours on end. She happened to have my second book, Upstaged, handy and began to read to her during her responsive times. Sometimes her mother would just lie there with her eyes closed, and Judy didn’t know if she was listening. Frequently, she’d ask, “Do you want me to continue reading, Mom?” Her mother would respond. A nod or a short word.
“Yes.”
A nurse perched behind Judy and became involved in the story, too. So Judy would continue reading aloud, giving comfort to her mother and providing a little armchair escapism to her nurse. Solace came from the tentative loving voice of her daughter, close and warm. And she was reading my words.
It floored me.
In a flash, I realized if one woman could be comforted on her deathbed by my books – I’d already reached the definitive pinnacle of success.
You’ll never know how your stories will affect the world. Not until it happens. So keep writing and imagine the best. Not the money, not the fame, not the ability to quit that day job. Imagine affecting one solitary soul in their final moments on this earth, and you’ll have pictured… the ultimate reward.
~~~
I have a little idea of what Aaron is talking about here. When stories like this start drifting back to you, you know that you've made it as a writer, even if you're not on the New York Times best-seller lists, even if you never get rich.
And there's nothing quite like it.
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Banner

Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Guest Post: Bringing Back the Dead
And the last guest post for June by Aaron Paul Lazar rather follows on from last week's. I think it's kind of fun to look at these things, at how writers manipulate this whole other universe...and sometimes I wonder if, as in my Displaced Detective series, that universe really exists someplace...and what the effects of our manipulations might really be...
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
Bringing Back the Dead
by Aaron Paul Lazar
We writers don't often get to resurrect our dead.
For years I’ve regretted murdering one particularly sweet character early in my LeGarde Mystery series, specifically in the second book, Upstaged, where a psychopath lurks backstage in the high school musical. The victim: Ethel Fox, who loves dogs, is a high school janitor, and volunteers to help with the drama club’s productions. Ethel also happens to have Down Syndrome. Looking back now, I realize I probably cast her as a victim to rile up my readers with righteous anger, and to make the villain scream “evil”.
Now, five years later, I want a do-over.
My cardinal rules include no killing of main characters—after all, these folks carry the series through its ten books. I’ll never kill Gus or Camille, or Siegfried, even if you might worry that they’re dead in some books[1] (wink). But the featured characters, who change from book to book, are always fair game.
When my publisher, Lida Quillen at Twilight Times Books, expressed interest in re-releasing my first two books[2] along with the rest of the series as the “author’s preferred editions,” I was overjoyed. Now I could repair some of those newbie-writer awkward phrases, get rid of the excess adverbs and adjectives, and tidy up the prose. Besides, after writing fifteen books (I have three mystery series now), my skills have improved. It’s only natural to look back at one’s first books and grimace. So, after securing rights from the first publisher, I signed the new contracts and started the rewrites.
I didn’t change much in Double Forté, except to tidy up the prose, add a bit more spice to a few scenes, and delete a bunch of excess words.
But when I started to polish Upstaged, I remembered an embarrassing and awkward experience I had last year, and was consumed with the idea of tweaking the plot.
While working at a facility for physically and intellectually challenged adults who love music, art, writing, and theater, my daughter Melanie invited me in to help during their summer festival. I arrived feeling quite virtuous, since I took a vacation day to volunteer, but instead of “helping” the folks there, I spent the day being humbled, time after time. The individuals radiated joy, and were delirious with excitement because they were about to put on a musical show for their visitors. Family and friends crowded the facility, and although I saw evidence of serious physical and intellectual “disabilities,” I was convinced these lovely people did not in any sense of the word feel disabled on that day.
They danced and sang in the hallways, held hands and giggled, painted gorgeous pictures from wheelchairs (some were displayed in local art shows), and delighted in the costumes in which they’d been dressed for the celebration.
While I snapped pictures for their scrapbooks, I fell in love with the people and teachers, was suitably humbled, and realized that after eight hours of fun, I had received much more than I’d given. A few days later, I donated Upstaged to one of the higher functioning members of the writing class, knowing that she loved musicals.
So, a year passed, and the writing teacher asked me if I’d come in and give a talk to her students who loved books and writing. Thrilled, I arranged the date. We had a blast, and talked for almost two hours. They asked great questions, and I delighted in their company. It was after the class while I was donating more books that I suddenly remembered I’d killed off a character with Down Syndrome in Upstaged.
What had I been thinking? Why did I donate the very book where I let the villain kill a character who represents so many people at this arts center? Was I insane? To be honest, it had been so long since I’d written the book, I really hadn’t remembered about Ethel, but when I did, I kicked myself. Repeatedly.
It was this experience that made me bring Ethel back to life. Not only did I prevent her murder in a way that didn’t goof up the original plot, but I gave her a cuter name. What kind of a name is Ethel for a sweet, helpful, loving lady? Her new name is Cindi. I think it fits her. Don’t you?
The Lord keeps me humble. It’s a good thing. There’s nothing worse than a big-headed fool. But frankly, he doesn’t have to work very hard at it. I give him lots of help.
The newest book in the LeGarde Mystery series, Don’t Let the Wind Catch You, #6, has just been released. It’s stands alone like all of the other books in the series and can be read in any order. I try to write all my series like this so folks can pick up any book at any time and enjoy it. Don’t Let the Wind Catch You is a sequel to the prequel of Double Forté (Tremolo: cry of the loon was the prequel.)
I seriously hope there are no urges ten years from now to get another “do-over” with this book, because that cycle of self-doubt and the obsessive need to perfect can be exhausting. I hereby declare that I am happy with this story and will not come back in years to come to nitpick it to death. There. I said it. Now I just have to stick to my promise (grin).
[1] Mazurka, (2009 Twilight Times Books)
[2] Double Forté (2005), Upstaged (2006)
~~~
I think that all writers, at some point, experience a desire for a "do-over." Sometimes we get it, and sometimes we don't. And sometimes, I think, it's better that the book is taken out of our hands at a certain point! I know that I have an unquenchable tendency to "tweak" repeatedly, and will continue to do so no matter how good the book may already be. These tweaks, if not reined in, can actually spoil a perfectly good book.
So I am, so far, thankful that I have NOT had an opportunity for a "do-over"!
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
Bringing Back the Dead
by Aaron Paul Lazar
We writers don't often get to resurrect our dead.
For years I’ve regretted murdering one particularly sweet character early in my LeGarde Mystery series, specifically in the second book, Upstaged, where a psychopath lurks backstage in the high school musical. The victim: Ethel Fox, who loves dogs, is a high school janitor, and volunteers to help with the drama club’s productions. Ethel also happens to have Down Syndrome. Looking back now, I realize I probably cast her as a victim to rile up my readers with righteous anger, and to make the villain scream “evil”.
Now, five years later, I want a do-over.
My cardinal rules include no killing of main characters—after all, these folks carry the series through its ten books. I’ll never kill Gus or Camille, or Siegfried, even if you might worry that they’re dead in some books[1] (wink). But the featured characters, who change from book to book, are always fair game.
When my publisher, Lida Quillen at Twilight Times Books, expressed interest in re-releasing my first two books[2] along with the rest of the series as the “author’s preferred editions,” I was overjoyed. Now I could repair some of those newbie-writer awkward phrases, get rid of the excess adverbs and adjectives, and tidy up the prose. Besides, after writing fifteen books (I have three mystery series now), my skills have improved. It’s only natural to look back at one’s first books and grimace. So, after securing rights from the first publisher, I signed the new contracts and started the rewrites.
I didn’t change much in Double Forté, except to tidy up the prose, add a bit more spice to a few scenes, and delete a bunch of excess words.
But when I started to polish Upstaged, I remembered an embarrassing and awkward experience I had last year, and was consumed with the idea of tweaking the plot.
While working at a facility for physically and intellectually challenged adults who love music, art, writing, and theater, my daughter Melanie invited me in to help during their summer festival. I arrived feeling quite virtuous, since I took a vacation day to volunteer, but instead of “helping” the folks there, I spent the day being humbled, time after time. The individuals radiated joy, and were delirious with excitement because they were about to put on a musical show for their visitors. Family and friends crowded the facility, and although I saw evidence of serious physical and intellectual “disabilities,” I was convinced these lovely people did not in any sense of the word feel disabled on that day.
They danced and sang in the hallways, held hands and giggled, painted gorgeous pictures from wheelchairs (some were displayed in local art shows), and delighted in the costumes in which they’d been dressed for the celebration.
While I snapped pictures for their scrapbooks, I fell in love with the people and teachers, was suitably humbled, and realized that after eight hours of fun, I had received much more than I’d given. A few days later, I donated Upstaged to one of the higher functioning members of the writing class, knowing that she loved musicals.
So, a year passed, and the writing teacher asked me if I’d come in and give a talk to her students who loved books and writing. Thrilled, I arranged the date. We had a blast, and talked for almost two hours. They asked great questions, and I delighted in their company. It was after the class while I was donating more books that I suddenly remembered I’d killed off a character with Down Syndrome in Upstaged.
What had I been thinking? Why did I donate the very book where I let the villain kill a character who represents so many people at this arts center? Was I insane? To be honest, it had been so long since I’d written the book, I really hadn’t remembered about Ethel, but when I did, I kicked myself. Repeatedly.
It was this experience that made me bring Ethel back to life. Not only did I prevent her murder in a way that didn’t goof up the original plot, but I gave her a cuter name. What kind of a name is Ethel for a sweet, helpful, loving lady? Her new name is Cindi. I think it fits her. Don’t you?
The Lord keeps me humble. It’s a good thing. There’s nothing worse than a big-headed fool. But frankly, he doesn’t have to work very hard at it. I give him lots of help.
The newest book in the LeGarde Mystery series, Don’t Let the Wind Catch You, #6, has just been released. It’s stands alone like all of the other books in the series and can be read in any order. I try to write all my series like this so folks can pick up any book at any time and enjoy it. Don’t Let the Wind Catch You is a sequel to the prequel of Double Forté (Tremolo: cry of the loon was the prequel.)
I seriously hope there are no urges ten years from now to get another “do-over” with this book, because that cycle of self-doubt and the obsessive need to perfect can be exhausting. I hereby declare that I am happy with this story and will not come back in years to come to nitpick it to death. There. I said it. Now I just have to stick to my promise (grin).
[1] Mazurka, (2009 Twilight Times Books)
[2] Double Forté (2005), Upstaged (2006)
~~~
I think that all writers, at some point, experience a desire for a "do-over." Sometimes we get it, and sometimes we don't. And sometimes, I think, it's better that the book is taken out of our hands at a certain point! I know that I have an unquenchable tendency to "tweak" repeatedly, and will continue to do so no matter how good the book may already be. These tweaks, if not reined in, can actually spoil a perfectly good book.
So I am, so far, thankful that I have NOT had an opportunity for a "do-over"!
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
The Creation of El Vengador
By Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Today we are having a "book bomb" for my new ebook, El Vengador! A book bomb is when all of the fans and readers of an author get together and purchase their copies all on the same day! This can get the ball rolling on sales, because it results in a significant bump in the sales rankings, that in turn pulls in people who are browsing but unfamiliar with the author. But first, a little bit about El Vengador, just to...you know...whet your appetite.
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Today we are having a "book bomb" for my new ebook, El Vengador! A book bomb is when all of the fans and readers of an author get together and purchase their copies all on the same day! This can get the ball rolling on sales, because it results in a significant bump in the sales rankings, that in turn pulls in people who are browsing but unfamiliar with the author. But first, a little bit about El Vengador, just to...you know...whet your appetite.
Deputy Sheriff Michael
Kirtchner gets an "unknown disturbance" dispatch call to a remote
house trailer in the swamp. There, he discovers an old woman and a dog,
terrorized by a mysterious beast, which he takes to be a bear. But when he
contacts Game Warden Jeff Stuart to come trap the animal, Stuart tells him to
get out if he values his life - this is no ordinary animal. Is Kirtchner up
against a Swamp Ape - a Florida version of Bigfoot - or something
more...sinister?
El Vengador
is my first deliberate foray into the paranormal and horror genres. I’ve had
numerous friends try to convince me to do so in the last few years, but never
was able to get hold of the right story idea. So I waited and let it
“percolate” in the back of my mind.
But when a Facebook friend (who wants to remain anonymous - for obvious reasons!)
told me the story of his encounter of a mysterious “Florida Swamp Ape” during
his tenure as a deputy sheriff, I was fascinated. And when he gave his
permission for me to fictionalize the story, I knew I had found my paranormal
horror story.
So I took his basic story from his own words and I
transformed it. I cleaned it up, couched it in proper writer’s grammar, changed
the point of view. I changed the deputy’s name, added the perspective of other
civilians who encountered the creature…and then I twisted the knife.
Because, you see, I have some Cherokee in me. Oh, the family
can’t prove it, not after the way the Cherokee were ejected from their
properties during the Trail of Tears; any Native American who could pass as
white in those days, did, and all records of their heritage were lost. But
because I have several distinctive genetic expressions of that heritage, I am
accepted by most elders I know as Cherokee. And my curiosity being what it is,
along with my sincerity in wanting to know, I’ve been taught numerous things
that most people don’t generally
know.
Like the fact that the Cherokee (along with the Seminole and
the Iroquois Confederacy, among others) are purported to have been offshoots –
colonies, if you will – of the Maya peoples. It’s interesting to note that,
just as the “Cherokee” are a group of tribes [Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw,
etc.], the Seminole are a group of tribes [Seminole, Creek, Miccosukee, etc.],
the Iroquois Confederacy are a group of tribes [Mohawk, Onondaga, Oneida,
Seneca, Cayuga, and later Tuscarora] ― so too are the Maya really a collection
of tribes [Yucatec, Tzotzil, Tzeltal, Ch’ol, Kekchi, Mopan, and more]! The Maya
comprised, and still comprise (oh yes, they’re still around ― they were
laughing their butts off at the white fear of the “end” of their repeating
calendar), more than 25 different peoples. The notion of splinter groups of
this huge nation (it covered a substantial portion of Central America, butted
up against the Aztec/Olmec empire, and expanded out into the Caribbean) moving
up into Florida, then up the East Coast of North America, isn’t hard to believe
at all.
It’s also true ― as I mentioned in the story ― that the
medicine people and elders hold that the Maya, in turn, came from some place
across the Great Sea to the East. Depending on who you talk to, this means we/they
originated in Ancient Egypt, Phoenicia, Greece, the Biblical traders of
Tarshish, or even Atlantis!
So it seemed to me that it would put a fun spin on things if
I had this swamp ape, this mysterious unknown creature, be something other than
pure animal. As it turned out, my research into the Maya turned up a mysterious
“Howler Monkey God,” one Hun-Batz by name, and an entire mythology in which this god was
set. Monkey = simian, and ape = simian,
so it wasn’t a huge jump for me, to proposing a curse invoking the Son of
Hun-Batz. And suddenly the whole thing congealed into this amazing,
suspenseful, paranormal horror story.
How amazing and suspenseful? Well, let’s just say I
literally creeped myself out. I’m a night owl, prone to insomnia and getting up
in the night to putter around until I can fall back asleep. And I immediately discovered
that I didn’t enjoy that anymore; I had a constant feeling that there might be...something...outside, in the yard, in the dark, watching through the windows and
doors. When I did go back to bed, it was only to have lucid nightmares about
the creature and the events in the book! I took to closing the curtains and
blinds, avoiding the windows at night. Finally I gave up writing on the story
after sundown, choosing to write only in the light, and hoping to get the
imagery out of my head by bedtime.
I was more or less successful in that. I find that I still
do better not to think about the book at night, and I still have the blinds and
curtains closed at night. But our neighborhood is well lit with street lights,
and the birds cluster in the trees around the house and sing cheerfully. So I
know there’s nothing out there that they think is unusual. And that is
comforting.
I don’t know that I’ll regularly write horror. I’m inclined
to think, from my experiences with El Vengador, that I might not be cut out for that! Still and all, much of the
science fiction mystery I do write
tends to have strong elements of both paranormal and thriller, with the
occasional seasoning of horror concepts thrown in for good measure. So I think
I can take what I have learned from the experience and fold it back into my
other works. And I think they’ll be the better for it.
And you never know. After all, my friend really did
encounter…something…in the swamps of
Florida…
~~~
El Vengador is an ebook available through Amazon. If you're interested, please seriously consider purchasing it today, and let's see how high we can drive the sales ranking! Best-seller? Through the roof!
-Stephanie Osborn
Labels:
Amazon,
book bomb,
El Vengador,
Florida,
horror,
paranormal,
Stephanie Osborn,
swamp ape,
thriller
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Guest Post: Thanks, Downton Abbey – You Made Me a Murderer
Yet another fascinating post by Aaron Paul Lazar. Seriously, I like this one, because I've done it and it does indeed create a stir in my fandom. I know where he's coming from.
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
Thanks, Downton Abbey – You Made Me a Murderer
by Aaron Paul Lazar
First of all, I have to blame my mother for getting me hooked on Downton Abbey. While visiting her last November, we spent several days enjoying walks in the woods, cooking together, playing scrabble, and yes—watching Downton Abbey every evening.
I’d heard about it, of course. But I had no idea.
I mean, NO idea.
This series is so addictive I was riveted to the television—a very unusual situation for me, mind you. We started out with season one, and by the time I was ready to fly home I’d already ordered the first two seasons (I HAD to own them) and pre-ordered season three.
I was seriously hooked. I adored the characters.
Bates. Mrs. Hughes. Anna. Sybil. Thomas. O’Brien. William. Daisy. Mrs. Patmore. Oh, I could list the whole darned cast here, they are all so good. If you’ve watched the show, I’m sure you know what I mean.
There’s a lot of history and gorgeous countryside, stupendous shots of the inside of this authentic marvelous home in England. Horses. Dogs. And drama.
Oh, the drama. The superb conflict. And last, but certainly not least, the unrequited love…
I’m a terrible sucker for unrequited love, and I feature it continuously in my mysteries, including the LeGarde, Moore, and Tall Pines series. I love the aching, the longing, the never-quite-making-it-there sensation of one loving another, but the other doesn’t quite get it. And maybe the guy really loves the gal but she thinks he hates her… you know exactly what I mean, don’t you?
There’s a slight soap opera-ish quality to the Downton Abbey storylines, but they’re much more dignified and told in such a classy setting that it doesn’t seem over-the-top, it seems just right. In Downton Abbey, one’s emotions are pulled and stretched taut in the opposite direction—usually during only one episode.
This program is so invasive, that I couldn’t stop thinking about the huge cast of family and servants. I’d ached for resolution. I pined for the characters. I dreamt about them.
I watched the first two seasons night after night with my wife, who to my delight also became hooked. During Christmas, all I could think of was the DVD set due in January. Season three was on its way.
When it arrived (shortly after I finished with Murdoch Mysteries, season five, another absolutely addictive and marvelous series!), we watched every night.
That’s when the producers blew me away by starting to kill people.
Okay, so they did kill one very dear and sweet character earlier on. (I won’t mention his name here in case you haven’t watched yet.) I was heartbroken, lamenting his loss for months.
Seriously, I was SO upset. I couldn’t help but rant about it. Eventually, I got over it and realized maybe the young actor had greener pastures to pursue. I forgave the producers for killing him off.
Then—to my horror—they killed yet another character! This one was one of my all time favorites. A brave, sweet, innocent, darling girl. I was furious! My wife and I stared open-mouthed at each other, sputtering, “How COULD they?” It took a while to get used to this travesty until the last episode of season three rolled onto the screen.
Guess what? They did it again, only this time to one of the main characters who had shaped the series from day one. A MAJOR character, one without which you could never imagine the series going forward.
As a writer, I’ve been thinking about how much this upset my wife and me, and all our family and friends who also follow Downton Abbey. We talked about it for days, still horribly upset about the losses.
It was at that point I started to think about how much of a splash those killings had started. Boy, did they get good press out of it. And, in my author’s brain, I started to think the unthinkable.
Should I kill off one of my main characters?
Sure, I’ve “killed” before, I write mysteries, after all. Some feature characters have been hurt or even murdered. And in For Keeps, I killed off a beloved main character, only to bring her back again through some pretty fancy time-travel footwork into Sam Moore’s past. But in general, I have promised my readers “I’ll never hurt or kill one of the main characters you have come to love” in either LeGarde Mysteries, Moore Mysteries, or Tall Pines Mysteries.
I seriously wondered if I should I break my promise.
When this all turmoil and upheaval in Downton Abbey took place, I was smack dab in the middle of writing my seventeenth book, the fourth in my Tall Pines Mystery series. (Book 1: For the Birds (2011, Twilight Times Books); Book 2: Essentially Yours (2012, Twilight Times Books), Book 3: Sanctuary (coming soon); book 4: Murder on the Sacandaga).
I started to consider doing away with Quinn (Marcella’s beautiful Seneca husband), or Sky (her ruggedly handsome ex-beau from her youth), or Callie (my protagonist’s agoraphobic best friend).
I pondered the impact of how these deaths would shape the future of the series. How would the dynamics change? Would it be too dark? Too maddening? Too damned sad?
I expanded my sights to Copper, the six-foot tall black policewoman with an attitude who had rescued Callie from her sadness and become her soul mate and partner. After all Callie had endured—and her past traumas were extreme—could I now deprive her of the one woman she’d found to love?
I decided to do it.
I wrote the chapter. The serial killer went on a rampage and in the heat of trying to escape, killed Copper.
I kept going, not allowing myself to think too much. But inside, I kept thinking how could I do that? What’s Callie going to do? She’ll be totally destroyed!
Since I did this horrific thing, I’ve been second-guessing myself to the point of obsession. I’m already obsessed to the point of lunacy about my characters, but this is getting bad, really bad.
I might “undo” it now. I think I have complicated the plot a little too much with this murder. On top of all the other poor victims of the serial killer… it may be just too much.
So, thank you, Downton Abbey, for messing up my focus and making me into a senseless murderer.
(And seriously, thank you Downton Abbey for giving us such a thrill ride this year!)
~~~
As to which one(s) of MY books I've killed off characters?
Well, you'll just have to read and find out, won't you?
(insert maniacal laughter here)
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
Thanks, Downton Abbey – You Made Me a Murderer
by Aaron Paul Lazar
First of all, I have to blame my mother for getting me hooked on Downton Abbey. While visiting her last November, we spent several days enjoying walks in the woods, cooking together, playing scrabble, and yes—watching Downton Abbey every evening.
I’d heard about it, of course. But I had no idea.
I mean, NO idea.
This series is so addictive I was riveted to the television—a very unusual situation for me, mind you. We started out with season one, and by the time I was ready to fly home I’d already ordered the first two seasons (I HAD to own them) and pre-ordered season three.
I was seriously hooked. I adored the characters.
Bates. Mrs. Hughes. Anna. Sybil. Thomas. O’Brien. William. Daisy. Mrs. Patmore. Oh, I could list the whole darned cast here, they are all so good. If you’ve watched the show, I’m sure you know what I mean.
There’s a lot of history and gorgeous countryside, stupendous shots of the inside of this authentic marvelous home in England. Horses. Dogs. And drama.
Oh, the drama. The superb conflict. And last, but certainly not least, the unrequited love…
I’m a terrible sucker for unrequited love, and I feature it continuously in my mysteries, including the LeGarde, Moore, and Tall Pines series. I love the aching, the longing, the never-quite-making-it-there sensation of one loving another, but the other doesn’t quite get it. And maybe the guy really loves the gal but she thinks he hates her… you know exactly what I mean, don’t you?
There’s a slight soap opera-ish quality to the Downton Abbey storylines, but they’re much more dignified and told in such a classy setting that it doesn’t seem over-the-top, it seems just right. In Downton Abbey, one’s emotions are pulled and stretched taut in the opposite direction—usually during only one episode.
This program is so invasive, that I couldn’t stop thinking about the huge cast of family and servants. I’d ached for resolution. I pined for the characters. I dreamt about them.
I watched the first two seasons night after night with my wife, who to my delight also became hooked. During Christmas, all I could think of was the DVD set due in January. Season three was on its way.
When it arrived (shortly after I finished with Murdoch Mysteries, season five, another absolutely addictive and marvelous series!), we watched every night.
That’s when the producers blew me away by starting to kill people.
Okay, so they did kill one very dear and sweet character earlier on. (I won’t mention his name here in case you haven’t watched yet.) I was heartbroken, lamenting his loss for months.
Seriously, I was SO upset. I couldn’t help but rant about it. Eventually, I got over it and realized maybe the young actor had greener pastures to pursue. I forgave the producers for killing him off.
Then—to my horror—they killed yet another character! This one was one of my all time favorites. A brave, sweet, innocent, darling girl. I was furious! My wife and I stared open-mouthed at each other, sputtering, “How COULD they?” It took a while to get used to this travesty until the last episode of season three rolled onto the screen.
Guess what? They did it again, only this time to one of the main characters who had shaped the series from day one. A MAJOR character, one without which you could never imagine the series going forward.
As a writer, I’ve been thinking about how much this upset my wife and me, and all our family and friends who also follow Downton Abbey. We talked about it for days, still horribly upset about the losses.
It was at that point I started to think about how much of a splash those killings had started. Boy, did they get good press out of it. And, in my author’s brain, I started to think the unthinkable.
Should I kill off one of my main characters?
Sure, I’ve “killed” before, I write mysteries, after all. Some feature characters have been hurt or even murdered. And in For Keeps, I killed off a beloved main character, only to bring her back again through some pretty fancy time-travel footwork into Sam Moore’s past. But in general, I have promised my readers “I’ll never hurt or kill one of the main characters you have come to love” in either LeGarde Mysteries, Moore Mysteries, or Tall Pines Mysteries.
I seriously wondered if I should I break my promise.
When this all turmoil and upheaval in Downton Abbey took place, I was smack dab in the middle of writing my seventeenth book, the fourth in my Tall Pines Mystery series. (Book 1: For the Birds (2011, Twilight Times Books); Book 2: Essentially Yours (2012, Twilight Times Books), Book 3: Sanctuary (coming soon); book 4: Murder on the Sacandaga).
I started to consider doing away with Quinn (Marcella’s beautiful Seneca husband), or Sky (her ruggedly handsome ex-beau from her youth), or Callie (my protagonist’s agoraphobic best friend).
I pondered the impact of how these deaths would shape the future of the series. How would the dynamics change? Would it be too dark? Too maddening? Too damned sad?
I expanded my sights to Copper, the six-foot tall black policewoman with an attitude who had rescued Callie from her sadness and become her soul mate and partner. After all Callie had endured—and her past traumas were extreme—could I now deprive her of the one woman she’d found to love?
I decided to do it.
I wrote the chapter. The serial killer went on a rampage and in the heat of trying to escape, killed Copper.
I kept going, not allowing myself to think too much. But inside, I kept thinking how could I do that? What’s Callie going to do? She’ll be totally destroyed!
Since I did this horrific thing, I’ve been second-guessing myself to the point of obsession. I’m already obsessed to the point of lunacy about my characters, but this is getting bad, really bad.
I might “undo” it now. I think I have complicated the plot a little too much with this murder. On top of all the other poor victims of the serial killer… it may be just too much.
So, thank you, Downton Abbey, for messing up my focus and making me into a senseless murderer.
(And seriously, thank you Downton Abbey for giving us such a thrill ride this year!)
~~~
As to which one(s) of MY books I've killed off characters?
Well, you'll just have to read and find out, won't you?
(insert maniacal laughter here)
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Guest Blog: On Bluebeard, by Theodora Goss
There has been a bit of a hoopla in SF fandom in the last few weeks/months over gender roles in novels - by writers, artists, editors, and publishers. As a woman in the space program, as a young woman aiming for the space program, I have had to deal with everything from, "Well, your high school aptitude tests show that you have some considerable scientific skill. We recommend you become...a nurse," to having a male colleague walk into my office, close the door, and wholly unexpectedly grab my breasts (somehow thinking that, in doing so, he was paying me a compliment), to reporting sexual harassment and finding that I was the one they were considering firing, and more...this is the sort of thing I have had to deal with to get where I am - which is still not where I WANT to be. (Give me time.)
Theodora Goss' blog post speaks to the differing ways that men and women view certain (not all) situations and why, and with her permission I repost it for you here in its entirety (saving only the illustrations, which unfortunately did not want to port).
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
~~~
I know that Theodora's original blog got several troll posts, and I will not be surprised if that occurs here as well. Should that occur, it will be met with all the respect it deserves. Just like people that try to put me (and by extension, other editors, writers, publishers etc.) down merely because of my (our) gender.
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Theodora Goss' blog post speaks to the differing ways that men and women view certain (not all) situations and why, and with her permission I repost it for you here in its entirety (saving only the illustrations, which unfortunately did not want to port).
-Stephanie Osborn
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
~~~
On Bluebeard
By Theodora Goss
This blog post is really about how differently men and women can perceive
certain things, but I didn’t think that would make a very good title. And
Bluebeard does come into it, as you’ll see.
Some time ago, a friend of mine whom I will call Nathan, because his name
is Nathan, and I were having a conversation. Nathan is a big, strong guy, about
twice my size. He told me that when he had lived in New Orleans, he had loved
walking around the city alone, late at night. I said to him, “Nathan, I’ve
never walked around a city alone late at night.” There was a moment of silence,
and then he said something like, “Oh, right. Sometimes I forget how different
it must be for a woman.”
I’m writing this post in part because there have been conversations
recently, in the media and on the internet, that have made clear how
differently men and women can perceive certain words and actions. Some of those
conversations have been about the literary world I live in, particularly the
fantasy and science fiction corner of it. And the point I want to make,
centrally in this blog post, is that something that may not seem threatening to
a man may seem profoundly threatening to a woman. I’ll give you an example.
Scenario: A woman passes a man on the street. He says, “Hello, beautiful.”
How the man perceives this: “I paid her a compliment.”
How the woman perceives this: “Is he going to attack me?”
How the man perceives this: “I paid her a compliment.”
How the woman perceives this: “Is he going to attack me?”
I don’t know if this is true for all women, in all circumstances, but if
I’m the woman in that scenario, particularly if I’ve been walking down that
street absorbed in my own thoughts, as soon as I’m spoken to I will immediately
check my surroundings. What time of day is it? Is there anyone else on the
street? How threatening does the man seem? (Although I have to add, if I am
completely honest, that I never walk down a street lost in thought. I used to
when I was younger. I’m smarter now.)
When I teach my class on fairy tales, I ask students about the moral of
“Bluebeard.” Charles Perrault gives us a moral, clearly marked “moral,” at the
end of the tale: “Curiosity, in spite of its appeal, often leads to deep
regret. To the displeasure of many a maiden, its enjoyment is short lived. Once
satisfied, it ceases to exist, and always costs dearly.” I ask my students, is
that really what we learned from the story?
No, they tell me. That moral doesn’t make sense. If Bluebeard’s wife hadn’t
been curious, she would never have known that he had killed his previous wives.
And although he tells her that he’s going to kill her because of her curiosity,
and we can infer that he killed most of his other wives for the same reason,
what about the first wife? Why did he kill her? Clearly this is a man who
simply likes killing his wives, and will eventually think of a reason to kill
again. So, I ask them, what is the moral? And eventually we come up with
something like this:
“Make sure you know whom you’re marrying, because your husband may be a
serial killer.”
If you’re a woman, and you’ve lived for a while in the world, you’ve
learned to be cautious. You’ve learned that you don’t know who people are, or
what they’re capable of, until you’ve known them for a long time, and sometimes
not even then. If a man is bothering a woman, it’s easy for another man to say
“Ignore him. He’s just a creep.” Or “He lacks social skills.” But the woman in
that situation has to approach it by thinking, what is the worst case scenario?
What is the worst that could happen? And then she has to act based on that
supposition. Often that means acting swiftly, decisively, with maximum effect.
Because you have to establish, definitively, that you are not to be messed
with.
She will be told, “You’re overreacting.” But she will also know that if
something does happen, if there is a worst case scenario, she will be told,
“You should have paid attention to the warning signs.” Either way, she faces
the possibility of being blamed.
Let’s go back to that first scenario, with the woman walking down the
street. If the man who thought he had paid her a compliment knew that she was
assessing him as a potential attacker, he might blame her: he might say, why
didn’t she realize that I was trying to be nice? What he wouldn’t know is how
many times she had been approached on a street by a man who said, “Hello,
beautiful,” and then continued with a sexual proposition. For an average woman,
it would be a least once, but probably more than once. After a while, if you’ve
been living while female, you get a sort of PTSD. Most women have been through
assaults of various kinds. (I once looked up from reading a book in the public
library to see a man masturbating on the seat across from me. I think I must have
been about fourteen?) Most women have dealt with some sort of silencing or
discrimination. (When I was at Harvard Law School, there were male students who
argued that women who were going to take time off to have and care for children
were taking up space that should go to qualified men.) This history conditions
how they respond, whether to a compliment on a street or to male writers who
talk about them with a lack of respect (see the latest SFWA scandal). (It’s
also worth knowing that women talk to one another: we know when a male writer
regularly hits on young female writers at conventions.)
“Bluebeard” has been interpreted in a variety of ways, but its simplest
meaning is a cautionary one, to women. What it really says is, be curious, be
bold, protect yourself. Considering the things women have to deal with, it’s
scarcely surprising that they have learned this particular lesson.
I know I’ve put a lot into this blog post, and parts of it may not fit
together with perfect logic. But it represents a series of things I’ve been
thinking recently about differences in perception. If you’re a man and want to
work or socialize with women, it’s probably worth considering how their
perception may be different from yours, and what may lie behind that
difference.
http://www.stephanie-osborn.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)